Tag Archives: Football

Lacrosse In The 1950’s: May 28, 1956 “Sports Illustrated” Article Asked Coaches And Players “How Would You Compare Lacrosse To Football?”


Lacrosse helps develop speed and maneuverability and is every bit as exciting as football. Lacrosse practice sessions are more fun than football practice and therefore lacrosse comes off the favorite. Men who play both both sports prefer lacrosse almost unanimously. HOWARD MYERS Jr., Lacrosse and football coach, Hofstra College, N.Y.

 F. MORRIS TOUCHSTONE
Lacrosse coach
U.S. Military Academy
West Point
Both appeal to the athlete who enjoys rugged competition. Both are highly developed team efforts, but the skills of the two differ. In football, the emphasis is on blocking and tackling. In lacrosse, ball handling with the stick, dodging and accurate shooting are vital.

JOHN J. THEOBALD
Deputy Mayor, N.Y.C.
President
Queens College
Although lacrosse is a wide open game, it is as rough and can be rougher than football. The great interest in football results from the coordination of the players and ball handling. Lacrosse must also have good team work, but the real skill is in passing the ball.

VICE-ADMIRAL C.T. DURGIN (ret.)
President
N.Y. State Maritime College
Lacrosse, originated by the American Indian, is new in most colleges but is building tremendous interest. The game seems a combination of soccer and basketball. Although it requires coordination and combative instinct, it is not as interesting to me as football.

RON BEAGLE
All-American end
U.S. Naval Academy
Annapolis
I was introduced to lacrosse at the Naval Academy. It’s my belief that if lacrosse were as widely publicized as football, it would be as popular. Like football, it requires speed, skill, stamina and desire. It’s interesting and exciting. There’s never a dull moment.

ED BUCKLEY
Hotel Manager
New York
Lacrosse is tougher. I played both. Never was hurt in football, but was knocked for a loop in lacrosse. When a guy swings his stick at you, look out! At Penn we were called the suicide squad. The Indians played lacrosse long before white men. Many players today are wilder than the Indians.

CAPTAIN ROBERT J. STROH
Captain
U.S.S. Saratoga
World’s largest warship
There’s great similarity. Both are body contact sports requiring great physical vigor. Good team work is a prime requisite in each sport. In both games a good big man is better than a good little man. For me, a former baseball player, both have equal appeal.

FERRIS THOMSEN
Lacrosse coach
Princeton University
Unlike football, with its break between plays, lacrosse takes more stamina due to continuous running. Like in football, speed, general athletic skill and the ability to give and take punishment is important. Fans who know both games like lacrosse better because it’s more open.

JIMMY BROWN
Football and lacrosse star
Syracuse University
I prefer to play football. It’s a bit rougher and packed with more pressure, tension and excitement. However, playing a midfield spot in lacrosse takes more out of me than football. I’m enchanted, too, with the skillful stickwork required. Lacrosse has more originality.

TOM SCOTT
Defensive end
Philadelphia Eagles
In lacrosse, speed and skill are prime requisites. Brawn is secondary. It requires more agility, finesse and I footwork than football, with more quick stops, turns, backward steps, etc. Even though there isn’t as much body contact, there are many head injuries from stickwork.

HOWARD MYERS Jr.
Lacrosse and football
coach
Hofstra College, N.Y.
Lacrosse helps develop speed and maneuverability and is every bit as exciting as football. Lacrosse practice sessions are more fun than football practice and therefore lacrosse comes off the favorite. Men who play both both sports prefer lacrosse almost unanimously.

ROBERT H. SCOTT
Lacrosse coach, Johns
Hopkins University
Baltimore, Md.
Lacrosse with its jarring blocks, long runs and passing, compares favorably with football in spectator appeal. But lacrosse requires more skill. A player must also know how to use a stick. Many college athletes now play both sports. Each offers the best in team work.

FRANK TAMBURELLO
Quarterback
University of Maryland
Football is a more thrilling sport, but lacrosse gives a true feeling of an enjoyable relaxing game. It can either be played with all the physical contact of football or with the finesse of basketball without violating the rules of the game. I prefer football but love to play lacrosse.

For more:  http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1069701/2/index.htm

Popularity Of Lacrosse To Increase With Spring Football Combinations


COLUMBUS, Ohio – The Ohio State men’s lacrosse team will face off against Denver in Ohio Stadium April 19, Joe Breschi, Buckeye head coach.

COLUMBUS, Ohio – The Ohio State men’s lacrosse team will face off against Denver in Ohio Stadium April 19, Joe Breschi, Buckeye head coach.

http://blogs.insidelacrosse.com/2008/09/03/lamade-osu-football-lacrosse-provide-an-interesting-model/#more-2938

Something is happening in the lacrosse world that has the capability of bringing the sport to heights never seen before. It is occurring at The Ohio State University, and the man responsible has very little to do with the lacrosse world. That man is Jim Tressel, OSU’s football coach.

I do not know the details of how then-Ohio State lacrosse coach Joe Breschi approached Tressel about playing a lacrosse game before the Buckeyes’ spring football game. But it can be assumed that Breschi must have had some doubts when he decided to ask the coach of one of the most prominent football programs in the country to share the most important day of the spring. That’s why it must have come as a total shock when Tressel, backed by AD Gene Smith, signed on for the idea.

Like much of lacrosse, the above scenario has its roots in Upstate New York. Tressel was an assistant football coach at Syracuse in the mid-1980s and said the lacrosse program often played a doubleheader with the football team’s spring game. He said the situation, however, was reversed: It was lacrosse that would lure a crowd to the spring football game.

Anyway, the game last April between the Buckeyes and Denver was a milestone. It ended up being the most attended on-campus game in the college lacrosse history, with more than 29,000 fans in attendance. And that event was not a one-off.

Even though Breschi has left Ohio State for North Carolina, Tressel’s commitment to lacrosse apparently has not wavered. He has agreed to let the lacrosse team share the stage with the spring game next April; this time, the Buckeyes will face Notre Dame.

With all those positive aspects surrounding the lacrosse/football “Spring Event,” it begs the question: “Why don’t more programs and college lacrosse coaches try to follow this model?”

And that question got me thinking. What other schools and lacrosse programs would not only benefit from such an opportunity, but also be great leaders in the movement? The following are a few that stood out.

Notre Dame and Penn State. Both schools have two of the top football programs in the country and could most easily replicate the Ohio State model. They each draw 50,000+ fans for their spring football games, which would probably result in attendances close to 20,000 for the lacrosse “undercard.”

The Fighting Irish and Nittany Lions’ lacrosse programs have had solid success, but haven’t quite been able to maintain spots in the top 10 consistently. A Spring Event like the one the Buckeyes put on would be incredibly beneficial for recruiting and notoriety for both programs. Lacrosse games in Notre Dame Stadium and Beaver Stadium would be sights to behold. (Notre Dame Stadium has hosted women’s lacrosse.)

Virginia. This would be a great fit for a Spring Event because it would benefit both the lacrosse and football programs. Traditionally, the UVa-Duke lacrosse game falls on the same weekend as UVa’s spring football game. The match-up between the Cavs and the Blue Devils has become one of the best rivalries in Division I lacrosse; it drew an overflow crowd of more than 8,000 at Klockner Stadium last spring.

In fact, it drew almost as many fans as the spring football game. The strange thing is that the two games were played at the same time and in different venues (doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, does it?). This would be a perfect opportunity to combine the events at Scott Stadium. Charlottesville is a town that revolves around the University of Virginia, and a lacrosse/football combo would be the highlight of the spring for many Cavalier fans.

To top it off, Al Groh, Virginia’s football coach, played lacrosse at UVa in the mid-1960s. And his current football team has at least 11 players who played lacrosse in high school, including several starters.

Michigan. This is an incredible wild card, but it could be the most important of all the possibilities. Having a Division I lacrosse program in Ann Arbor would be one of the best additions to the college game in many years. What better way to build momentum for the Wolverines’ club lacrosse program’s push to DI than to play a game before the Maze ‘n Blue’s Spring football game?

If the lacrosse program can prove to the University that the support is substantial, the chances of getting funding for a Division I program expands exponentially. The club team has already begun to attract attention by hosting a fall tournament in which Johns Hopkins and Army attended in 2007. Lastly, considering the Ohio State – Michigan rivalry, wouldn’t it make sense for Michigan to want to compete with the Buckeyes on every possible level? Rich Rodriguez is an innovator on the gridiron, so it would make sense that he would be intrigued by something as revolutionary as this.

Picture this, 10 years from now, the Buckeyes and Wolverines playing in front of 50,000 fans in late April in the Big House and then heading to the Columbus and the Horseshoe to do it all over again the following spring.

Maryland and Navy. This would be an interesting combination, as the two schools could rotate a home and home Spring Event series. Navy has played its spring football game with the lacrosse game; the most memorable such event came in 2004. Then, Navy and Johns Hopkins played a classic overtime game before around 19,000 fans. The football game followed.

The Terps and Midshipmen have a long-standing rivalry in lacrosse and the two football programs will face each other in 2010 and possibly 2014. In addition, the schools are 30 miles apart and draw some of the largest crowds in Division I lacrosse. This could be a major event in the state of Maryland. It would be a perfect opportunity for Inside Lacrosse to add another showcase event as both Annapolis and College Park are close to IL’s headquarters in Baltimore. Lastly, both athletic departments are sponsored by Under Armor so it could be a great promotional event for one of the biggest supporters of the sport of lacrosse.

There are obviously other universities that could put together a great event with the lacrosse/football combination. Syracuse, Duke and North Carolina are a few that come to mind (we hope that UNC football coach Butch Davis is as receptive to the idea as was Tressel, if Breschi asks him).

It just makes too much sense for another lacrosse program to try and replicate the Ohio State model. It has been nothing but positive for the sport and the Buckeyes.

The sport of lacrosse has been expanding at a record pace with an attendance of close to 50,000 at the 2008 Final Four, 20,000 fans at the Inside Lacrosse Face Off Classic and most recently the announcement of the Day of Rivals Weekend featuring Army v. Navy and Hopkins v. Maryland. These types of events wouldn’t be possible if the interest was not there. People are showing up in droves for lacrosse games and the sport has been very good at staying ahead of the curve to accommodate the increased popularity. This is just another opportunity to take advantage of the current wave of momentum. Combining the momentum that lacrosse has created with the force that is NCAA College Football would be an unbelievable addition to the spring lacrosse schedule.